Community chat platform pricing for large groups

AIThis description was written by a model from public signals. The facts behind it are listed under Evidence.

Problem

Community groups and non-profit organizations need affordable messaging and chat platforms but find per-user pricing models prohibitively expensive when scaling to dozens or hundreds of members. Discord offers a flat-rate premium tier, but alternatives charge per-user fees that become unaffordable for large communities.

Solution concept

A community chat platform with flat-rate or tiered pricing based on member count rather than per-user seats, allowing large non-profit and hobbyist communities to have full access to features at a predictable, manageable cost regardless of group size.

Who has it

Community organizers and administrators running non-profit or hobbyist groups with 50+ members; retro computing communities, enthusiast groups, and similar organizations.

How they handle it today

Today they use Discord (with its flat-rate Nitro subscription) or evaluate competing platforms. When considering alternatives, they encounter per-user pricing models that scale poorly, making the per-user cost prohibitive even when they would accept a higher total monthly fee.

Why now

Not stated in the source.

How it could charge

Subscription-based pricing with tiers by community size (e.g., flat fees for groups of 50–100, 100–500, 500+), positioned as competitive with or a multiple of Discord Nitro's $9.99/month cost, but structured to remain affordable as communities scale.