Opportunities › SEO auditing and optimization across search engines › Proposed app
Fieldmark
Audit and fix your site for Google, Bing and AI search in one place
- Score
- 49
- confidence 32
- Evidence
- 1
- items on the page
- Rivals
- 0
- named in sources
- First version
- 45 d
- estimate
- Type
- Desktop app
- PWA: runs in the browser, installs on Mac and Windows
- Market since
- 2004
- Mature market · AI estimate
ScreensConcept
Desktop app: SEO professionals audit sites, review detailed fix lists, track changes, and generate reports in sustained work sessions that benefit from larger screens and keyboard. Sample screens on a computer, in the proposed brand. Their numbers are sample data.
Site audit
3 new issues78 / 100
About this appAI proposal
Fieldmark audits your site once and shows how it stands in Google, Bing and AI-search answers. Each problem becomes a task with a plain reason, a suggested fix and a way to check it afterwards.
It is built for website owners, in-house marketers and small SEO teams who now juggle separate tools for each search surface and keep their notes in spreadsheets. Fieldmark keeps audit, plan, fix and re-check in one list.
Every change is logged with a before and after, so you can see what worked instead of guessing. Agencies can keep one workspace per client site and send a shareable report.
- Tagline
- One checklist for every place your site gets found.
- Voice
- ClearPracticalCalm
- Why this name
- Fieldmark suggests marking a site's fields of visibility, one place to see where a page stands and what to fix. It is plain, two syllables, and pronounceable.
In the first version
Members say which features they would use. It tells PWAS what people want; it changes no score.
One audit, several search surfaces
Crawl a site once and see checks grouped by Google, Bing and AI-search answer engines, with shared issues shown only once.
No member yet
Fix list with reasons
Each issue gets a plain-language reason, priority, affected pages and a suggested fix you can assign to someone.
No member yet
Before and after tracking
Log every change and re-check the affected pages, so you see which fixes moved results and which did nothing.
No member yet
AI-search readiness checks
Check whether crawlers are allowed, content is clearly structured, and key pages answer real questions.
No member yet
Brand identityAI proposal
Check the name against trademark registers before using it.
Palette
#F7F4ECPaper · surface#1D2B2AInk · text#1F6F5BFern · primary#E0A030Amber · accent#B8432FBrick · warning / data#D9E3DDMist · secondary surface
Typography
Aa
Fieldmark
PricingAI proposal
The material gives no competitor prices. These tiers follow the opportunity's idea of pricing by site size and audit frequency, and are a starting point to test.
Free
Free
- One site, up to 100 pages
- Monthly audit
- Basic issue list
Solo
$29 a month
- 3 sites, 2,000 pages each
- Weekly re-audits
- AI-search checks
- Change log with before/after
Agency
$99 a month
- 25 client sites
- Shareable client reports
- Task assignment
- Experiment tracking
Would you pay Solo · $29 a month?
Your answer tells PWAS which prices people accept. It changes no score.
No answers yet.
What it could be worthEstimate
What a software business making this much sells for today, from real deals. Pick a monthly revenue.
If it makes
Worth about
$194,000
Sale range $132,000 to $263,000
$120,000 a year in revenue
From 87 software businesses listed and sold on Empire Flippers in the last year, revenue vetted by the broker: they sell for about 19× their monthly revenue, most between 13× and 26×.
Measured on profit, the middle deal is 32× monthly net profit: about 2.7 years of profit.
An estimate, not an offer or financial advice. A real price depends on profit, growth, churn, how much of the work is the owner's, and the buyer.
How it would growAI proposal
How the product would reach new customers through its own use, and how the first ones would be found. A plan to test, not a result.
- Built-in loop
- Shared outputs. Users send clients and bosses a public report link with the audit, fixes done and before/after results. The page carries a small 'Made with Fieldmark' mark and a link to run a free audit.
- Do they become customers?
- Report readers are often site owners or marketing leads who could run their own audit. Test whether at least one in twenty report views starts a free audit, and whether any of those upgrade.
- First customers
- Small marketing agencies with five to twenty client sites, run by a technical SEO lead who now reports from spreadsheets.
- Where to reach them
- SEO communities: Share a free audit checklist for AI-search readiness in SEO forums and open-source discussions, and invite feedback.
- Direct outreach: Message agency owners on LinkedIn offering a free multi-site audit and report in return for a 20-minute interview.
- Content: Publish worked before-and-after audits of real public sites, each ending with a link to run a free audit.
- First milestone
- Five agencies each pay for a month and run at least three client re-audits.
Why people already pay for this
- VerifiedGitHub repository gained 448 stars in 72 days
Tech stack
Every proposal builds on the same PWA base, installable from the browser on any phone or computer. Dashed boxes are what this app adds.
- AppNext.js and TypeScript
- PWAManifest and service worker
- UITailwind CSS
- Data and authSupabase Postgres
- PaymentsStripe
- EmailResend
- HostingVercel
- This app · Site crawlerQueue-based crawl workers with headless browserAudits need to fetch and render many pages in the background, beyond what Vercel functions handle well.
- This app · Search data connectorsSearch console APIs for connected accountsLets users bring their own visibility data without paid third-party data.
RisksAI inference
- TechnicalCrawling large or script-heavy sites is costly and slow, and rendering pages like a search engine is hard to get right on a small team.
- AIAI-search surfaces have no stable, documented ranking rules, so readiness checks may be guesses that users cannot verify.
- CommercialEstablished SEO suites may add AI-search features, leaving little room for a newer tool unless it is clearly simpler.
- DataReliable search ranking and visibility data usually needs paid third-party sources or site owners' connected accounts, which raises costs and setup friction.
- CommercialThe only market evidence is repository growth, which shows developer interest and not proven willingness to pay.
Everything marked AI proposal or AI inference was written by a model from the evidence on the opportunity page. The proposed name must be checked against trademark registers before it is used.